The Fragments on Oligarchy and Democracy comprises nine brief passages attributed to the Athenian orator and statesman Antiphon, who was active in the late 5th century BCE. Preserved in quotations by later Roman grammarians primarily for their linguistic interest, these fragments are remnants of larger, now-lost political orations. They articulate a pointed comparison of constitutional forms, offering a critique of democracy as the capricious and unskilled rule of the masses while advocating for oligarchy as the governance of the wise and capable, which ensures stability and justice. The fragments are historically situated within the fierce political conflicts in Athens around 411 BCE, a period during which Antiphon was a leading architect of the oligarchic coup that briefly overthrew the democratic government. They are thus interpreted as persuasive texts composed for contemporary political agitation, providing a direct glimpse into the ideological warfare of the era. As one of the earliest extant systematic critiques of popular rule, the arguments within these fragments prefigure and influenced subsequent philosophical analyses of constitutions by thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle.
| 3 1 | κέρ‖]δους π[ροτι‐] μῶντ[ες. εἰ δὲ] μὴ κα[ὶ ἐπὶ] τοῖς ἱμ[ατίοις] διεφθά[ρη,] ἀλλ’ ἑτέ[ρους] ἰδὼν ἄλ[λο τι] κακουρ[γοῦν‐] τας, ἵνα μ[ὴ μη‐] νυτὴς [τοῦ] ἀδικήμ[ατος] — — — ἀρ‖χ]ὴν ἄρξαι [χρ]ήματα πολ[λ]ὰ διεχείρισα [κ]αὶ εὔθυναί μοι [ἦσ]αν ἃς ἐδεδοί[κε]ιν ἢ ἄτιμος [ἦ]ν ἢ κακόν [τι] ὑμᾶς εἰργα[σ]άμην ἢ δί[κ]ην ἐπιρρέ[π]ουσαν ἐδε[δοίκ]ειν; οὐ δῆ[τα] ἔγωγε, ἐπεὶ [οὐδ]έν μοι ἦν [τού]των.[15] |
| 4 fr a,col 1 | ἀλλ’ ὡς [χ]ρήματα ἀ[φεί]λεσθε ἐμοῦ; [ .. ] . ως τῶν [πρ]ογόνων [τῶν] ἐμῶν κα[κόν] τι εἰργα— — — (desunt 4 versus, ut videtur) [ .[21] |
| 4 fr a,col 2 | ]α ἄλλης τινὸς πολιτείας ἢ τῆς καθεστηκυίας ἐπιθυμοῦσιν ἵνα ἢ ὧν ἠδίκησαν δίκην μὴ δῶσιν ἢ ὧν ἔπαθον τιμωρῶνται καὶ αὖθις μηδὲν π[ά]σχωσιν. ἀλλ’ ἐμοὶ τοιοῦτον οὐδὲν ἦν. ἀλλὰ μὲν δὴ λέγουσιν οἱ κατήγοροι ὡς συνέγραφόν τε δίκας ἄλλοις καὶ ὡς ἐκέρδαινον ἀπὸ τούτου· οὔκουν ἐν μὲν τῇ ὀλιγαρχίᾳ οὐκ ἂν ἦν μοι τοῦτο, [ἐν] δ[ὲ τῇ δη‐] [μ]οκρα[τίᾳ πά‐] [λ]αι ὁ κρ[ατῶν] εἰμὶ ἐγὼ εἰδὼ[ς] τοῦ λέγειν.[5] |
| 4 fr a,col 3 | ἐν μὲν τῇ ὀλιγαρχίᾳ [ο]ὐδ[ε‐] νὸς ἔμ[ε]λλο[ν] ἄξιος ἔσεσθα[ι], ἐν δὲ τῇ δημοκρατ[ί]ᾳ πολλοῦ. φέρ[ε] δὴ πῶς εἰκό[ς] ἐστιν [ἐ]μὲ ὀλ[ι‐] γαρχίας ἐπιθυμεῖν; πότερον ταῦτα ἐκλογίζεσθαι οὐχ οἷός τ’ εἰ[μὶ] ἢ οὐ γιγνώσκειν τὰ λ[υσι‐] τελοῦντ[α ἐ‐] μαυτῷ[ αθῃ[ .. [ ξοις ἐδόκει; μὰ [το]ὺς θεοὺς τοὺς [Ὀλ]υμπίους οὔ[τοι], εἴ γε ὀρθῶς [δια]σκοπεῖσθε.[5] |
| 4 fr b,col 1 | [ἐπε]ιδὴ Θηρα[μέ]νης ὃς ἐμοῦ [κατ]ηγόρησεν [± 5] .. εν ἐν [τῇ βο]υλῇ ε[± 5]ς οὑτοσὶ [± 5]ρυς δι[± 5] . εκει [± 4] .. ηκει [± 6]το .. [± 6]στον [± 8] . ων [± 3] ... α ὁ πα — — — (desunt, ut videtur, 7 versus) σκε[ νυν[ δικα[ μηδ[ ειπο[ ανε[ ριον[ ξαιο[ οιον[ τουτ[ σουμ[ ρονπ[ εμεγ[ ειοσ[ νηθ[ ναια[ τουτο[ [ .[15] |
| 4 fr b,col 2 | ] . ο[] . [ — — — — — — [± 5] .[1] |
| 4 fr c,col 1 | . [ [± 4]νη[ [ .. ] . ου[ . ] ..... [ [± 4]πειδη .. [ [± 5] . ργασα [ .. ] . ηνουτεχ .. [ [ . ] .. ολασα . [ [± 4]ουτ . [ [vacat?] [± 3] . νω ... [ [± 4]ωτης . [ [± 4]ρχ[ [± 4]αρ . [ [± 4]ην[ [± 2] . φερ [± 2]κεῖ ὑμῖν [Φ]ρύνιχος ἢ Πει[σίσ]τρατος δι [2—3] . καλ . [ — — — — — — .[17] |
| 4 fr c,col 2 (17) | [ .[ .[ — — — (desunt 8 versus, ut videtur) — — — ο[ τοκ[ σεν .[1] |
| 4 fr d | . [ τουσ[ [ . ]ες . [ καὶ γυ[ καὶ π . [ μελλο[ σθαι υμ[ ὅτι απ[ σκον η[ εξοντου[ .. νει[ τ . μεθ[ που τιν[ κτι[ ᾧ ἔργῳ [[15] |
Also published as PDF.