eul_wid: kpu-ab
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20335421 PDFMarkdown

Fragments on Europe and Judea by Mnaseas of Patara

Mnaseas of Patara, a Greek geographer of the 3rd century BCE and a student of Eratosthenes, authored a comprehensive geographical compendium, a Periegesis describing the known world of the Mediterranean. The modern title "Fragments on Europe and Judea" refers to the surviving excerpts from this lost work that pertain specifically to those regions. These fragments are preserved only through citations by later authors, most notably the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus, who quotes Mnaseas in his polemical work Against Apion in order to refute him. Other brief passages are found in scholia and lexicographical sources, such as those by Herodian and Theognostus, which preserve Mnaseas's mention of specific place names like Kandys.

The content of these fragments exemplifies the core methodologies of Hellenistic geography, blending ethnographic description of foreign peoples with the cataloguing of places within a journey-based narrative framework. They incorporate local foundation myths and legends, treating them as part of the geographical record. The fragments concerning Judea are of particular historical significance, as they contain one of the earliest known non-Jewish references to the Temple in Jerusalem. However, Mnaseas's account is polemical, presenting a hostile and fantastical misrepresentation of Jewish worship. Following a trope that would recur in later anti-Jewish literature, he falsely claimed that the Jews venerated an ass's head within the Temple sanctuary, a story he attached to a fabricated tale of a man named Zabidon who supposedly stole a cult statue of Apollo.

Despite their inaccuracies and hostile intent, these fragments provide crucial evidence for understanding the early contours of Graeco-Jewish relations and the origins of anti-Jewish sentiment in classical antiquity. Mnaseas's work represents an early ethnographic attempt to describe Judea, and its polemical content was deemed significant enough to require a detailed refutation by Josephus centuries later, attesting to its perceived influence on later perceptions of Jewish culture and religion.

Αἴλιος Ἡρωδιανός τὰ εἰς «—υος» λήγοντα καθαρὸν ὑπὲρ δύο συλλαβὰς παραληγόμενα τῶι «υ» ... συνεσταλμένωι προπαροξύνεται ... «Κάνδυος»· μέμνηται Μνασέας ἐν τῶι Περὶ Εὐρώπης βιβλίωι ...

Θεόγνωστος τὰ διὰ τοῦ «—υος» καθαροῦ ὑπὲρ δύο συλλαβὰς κύρια προπαροξύτονα διὰ τοῦ «υ» ψιλοῦ γράφονται, οἷον ... «Κάνδυος», «Ἀλάσυος», «Φόγγυος».

Ἰώσηπος ὁ ἱστορικός τὴν πορείαν ποιουμένων τοὺς μὲν Ἰουδαίους ὑπὸ τοῦ παραδόξου τῆς θέας καταπεπληγμένους πόρρω μένοντας ἡσυχίαν ἄγειν, τὸν δὲ Ζάβιδον ἐπὶ πολλῆς ἡσυχίας εἰς τὸν ναὸν παρελθεῖν καὶ τὴν χρυσῆν ἀποσῦραι τοῦ κάνθωνος κεφαλήν—οὕτω γὰρ ἀστεϊζόμενος γέγραφεν—, καὶ πάλιν εἰς Δῶριν τὸ τάχος ἂπελθεῖν. ἆρα οὖν καὶ ἡμεῖς ἂν εἴποιμεν, ὅτι τὸν κάνθωνα τουτέστιν ἑαυτὸν Ἀπίων ἐπιφορτίζει καὶ ποιεῖ τῆς μωρολογίας ἅμα καὶ τῶν ψευσμάτων κατάγομον; καὶ γὰρ τόπους οὐκ ὄντας γράφει καὶ πόλεις οὐκ εἰδὼς μετατίθησιν. ἡ μὲν γὰρ Ἰδουμαία τῆς ἡμετέρας χώρας ἐστὶν ὅμορος κατὰ Γάζαν κειμένη, καὶ Δῶρα ταύτης ἐστὶν οὐδεμία πόλις, τῆς μέντοι Φοινίκης παρὰ τὸ Καρμήλιον ὄρος Δῶρα πόλις ὀνομάζεται μηδὲν ἐπικοινωνοῦσα τοῖς Ἀπίωνος φλυαρήμασι· τεσσάρων γὰρ ἡμερῶν ὁδὸν τῆς Ἰδουμαίας ἀφέστηκεν. τί δʼ ἡμῶν ἔτι κατηγορεῖ τὸ μὴ κοινοὺς ἔχειν τοῖς ἄλλοις θεούς, εἰ ῥαιδίως οὕτως ἐπείσθησαν οἱ πατέρες ἡμῶν ἥξειν τὸν Ἀπόλλωνα πρὸς αὐτοὺς καὶ μετὰ τῶν ἄστρων ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς ὠιήθησαν ὁρᾶν αὐτὸν περιπατοῦντα; ...

… ὁ ἐν τῆι Ἴωνος Ὀμφάληι κατʼ ἀρχὴν λεγόμενος Ἡρακλέους βόρειος ἵππος οὕτως· «Ὅρων μὲν ἤδη Πέλοπος ἐξελαύνομεν, Ἑρμῆ, βόρειον ἵππον, ἄνεται δʼ ὁδός». διαλέλυκε δʼ αὐτὸ Μνασέας ὁ Παταρεὺς ἐν τῶι Περὶ χρησμῶν.