eul_wid: eow-aa

Theagenes of Rhegium Testimonies in Greek

The Testimonies is a lost work by Theagenes of Rhegium, a late 6th-century BCE scholar. It represents one of the earliest known examples of systematic allegorical literary criticism. The work was not a continuous treatise but rather a collection of interpretations composed in defense of Homeric poetry, specifically addressing philosophical objections to the epic portrayal of the gods as engaging in undignified or immoral conflicts. Theagenes argued that such narratives contained deeper, non-literal meanings, proposing that the battles among deities in the Iliad were symbolic representations of conflicts between opposing natural elements, such as fire and water, or between abstract human qualities like wisdom and folly.

No manuscript of the Testimonies survives. Our knowledge of its content derives entirely from approximately five brief passages quoted or referenced by later ancient commentators. These sources include scholiasts annotating Homeric manuscripts and the philosopher Porphyry. The surviving fragments indicate that Theagenes employed a method of interpretation utilizing both physical allegory, where gods symbolize natural forces, and psychological allegory, where they represent faculties of the human mind. His primary aim was to preserve the cultural and educational authority of Homeric epic by reconciling it with emerging philosophical sensibilities. Modern scholarship regards Theagenes of Rhegium as the foundational figure for the subsequent long tradition of allegorical exegesis of Homer, a methodological approach that was later extensively developed by Stoic philosophers and became a central strand in the history of classical literary criticism.

1 TATIAN. 31 p. 31, 16 Schw. περὶ γὰρ τῆς Ὁμήρου ποιήσεως γένους τε αὐτοῦ καὶ χρόνου καθ’ ὃν ἤκμασεν προηρεύνησαν πρεσβύτατοι μὲν Θεαγένης τε ὁ Ῥηγῖνος κατὰ Καμβύσην γεγονὼς καὶ Στησίμβροτος ὁ Θάσιος [FGrHist. 107 F 21 II 521] καὶ Ἀντίμαχος ὁ Κολοφώνιος Ἡρόδοτός τε ὁ Ἁλικαρνασσεὺς [II 53. 116f.] καὶ Διονύσιος ὁ Ὀλύνθιος κτλ.
1a SCHOL. DIONYS. THRAC. p. 164, 23 Hilg. διττὴ δέ ἐστιν ἡ γραμματική· ἡ μὲν γὰρ περὶ τοὺς χαρακτῆρας καὶ τὰς τῶν στοιχείων ἐκφωνήσεις καταγίνεται, ἥτις καὶ γραμματικὴ λέγεται παλαιὰ οὖσα καὶ πρὸ τῶν Τρωικῶν, σχεδὸν δὲ καὶ ἅμα τῆι φύσει προελθοῦσα· ἡ δὲ περὶ τὸν ἑλληνισμόν, ἥτις καὶ νεωτέρα ἐστίν, ἀρξαμένη μὲν ἀπὸ Θεαγένους, τελεσθεῖσα 〈δὲ〉 παρὰ τῶν Περιπατητικῶν Πραξιφάνους τε καὶ Ἀριστοτέλους.
2 SCHOL. HOM. B zu Y 67 [Porphyr. I 240, 14 Schrad.] τοῦ ἀσυμφόρου μὲν ὁ περὶ θεῶν ἔχεται καθόλου λόγος, ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ τοῦ ἀπρεποῦς· οὐ γὰρ πρέποντας τοὺς ὑπὲρ τῶν θεῶν μύθους φησίν. πρὸς δὲ τὴν τοιαύτην κατηγορίαν οἱ μὲν ἀπὸ τῆς λέξεως ἐπιλύουσιν, ἀλληγορίαι πάντα εἰρῆσθαι νομίζοντες ὑπὲρ τῆς τῶν στοιχείων φύσεως, οἶον 〈ἐν〉 ἐναντιώσεσι τῶν θεῶν. καὶ γάρ φασι τὸ ξηρὸν τῶι ὑγρῶι καὶ τὸ θερμὸν τῶι ψυχρῶι μάχεσθαι καὶ τὸ κοῦφον τῶι βαρεῖ. ἔτι δὲ τὸ μὲν ὕδωρ σβεστικὸν εἶναι τοῦ πυρός, τὸ δὲ πῦρ ξηραντικὸν τοῦ ὕδατος. ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ πᾶσι τοῖς στοιχείοις, ἐξ ὧν τὸ πᾶν συνέστηκεν, ὑπάρχειν ἐναντώσιν, καὶ κατὰ μέρος μὲν ἐπιδέχεσθαι φθορὰν ἅπαξ, τὰ πάντα δὲ μένειν αἰωνίως. μάχας δὲ διατίθεσθαι αὐτόν, διονομάζοντα τὸ μὲν πῦρ Ἀπόλλωνα καὶ Ἥλιον καὶ Ἥφαιστον, τὸ δὲ ὕδωρ Ποσειδῶνα καὶ Σκάμανδρον, τὴν δ’ αὖ σελήνην Ἄρτεμιν, τὸν ἀέρα δὲ Ἥραν καὶ τὰ λοιπά. ὁμοίως ἔσθ’ ὅτε καὶ ταῖς διαθέσεσιν ὀνόματα θεῶν τιθέναι, τῆι μὲν φρονήσει τὴν Ἀθηνᾶν, τῆι δ’ ἀφροσύνηι τὸν Ἄρεα, τῆι δ’ ἐπιθυμίαι τὴν Ἀφροδίτην, τῶι λόγωι δὲ τὸν Ἑρμῆν, καὶ προσοικειοῦσι τούτοις· οὗτος μὲν οὖν 〈ὁ〉 τρόπος ἀπολογίας ἀρχαῖος ὢν πάνυ καὶ ἀπὸ Θεαγένους τοῦ Ῥηγίνου, ὃς πρῶτος ἔγραψε περὶ Ὁμήρου, τοιοῦτός ἐστιν ἀπὸ τῆς λέξεως.
3 SCHOL. HOM. A (zu A 381 ἐπεὶ μάλα οἱ φίλος ἦεν) Σέλευκός φησιν ἐν τῆι Κυπρίαι καὶ Κρητικῆι 〈εἶναι〉 ‘ ἐπεί ῥά νύ οἱ φίλος ἦεν ‘. καὶ Θ. οὕτως προφέρεται.
4 SUID. Θεαγένους χρήματα: ... εἰσὶ δὲ καὶ ἄλλοι δύο Θεαγένεις, εἷς μὲν ὁ περὶ Ὁμήρου γράψας, ἕτερος δὲ ὁ ἐπὶ μαλακίαι σκωπτόμενος.