eul_wid: kms-aa

Chrysippus of Soli Fragments of Chrysippus-Homeric Poems in Greek

The Fragments of Chrysippus on Homeric Poems constitutes a modern assemblage of excerpts in which the Stoic philosopher Chrysippus of Soli offers interpretations of Homeric verse. These nine fragments do not survive as an independent work but are preserved within the critical commentaries of later authors, primarily found in Homeric scholia, the biographical writings of Diogenes Laertius, and the skeptical critiques of Sextus Empiricus. The collection exemplifies the Stoic practice of allegorical exegesis, whereby Chrysippus sought to uncover latent philosophical doctrines within epic poetry. He systematically reinterpreted Homer’s mythological narratives and divine characters as expressions of Stoic physics, ethics, and theology. In this framework, the gods become physical principles: Zeus represents the pervasive cosmic reason or logos, while Hera symbolizes passive matter. The fragments also reveal Chrysippus engaging in detailed philological and grammatical analysis, debating points of syntax and word usage with contemporary scholars like Aristarchus to defend Homer’s text against charges of solecism or error. The original context for these remarks is lost; they were likely drawn from Chrysippus’s comprehensive, but no longer extant, treatises. Scholarly assessment views this corpus as a pivotal demonstration of how Stoic philosophers appropriated traditional Greek poetry, arguing that Homer possessed an intuitive, pre-philosophical understanding of cosmic order and human psychology. This allegorical method of reading poetic texts proved profoundly influential, providing a model for subsequent philosophical and religious hermeneutics in the ancient world.

769 Scholia in Homeri Iliadem A 129. Ζώϊλος δὲ ὁ Ἀμφιπολίτης καὶ Χρύσιππος ὁ Στωϊκὸς σολοικίζειν οἴονται τὸν ποιητὴν ἀντὶ ἑνικοῦ πληθυντικῷ χρησάμενον ῥήματι· τὸ γὰρ δῶσι φασὶ πληθυντικόν· ἀγνοοῦσι δὲ etc.
770 Scholia in Homeri. Iliad. Α 405. ὅς ῥα παρὰ Κρονίωνι· ὅτι ἐντεῦθεν ἐπὶ τοῦ Ἄρεως λέγεται οὐκ ὀρθῶς (1. Il. E 906) Ὅμηρος δέ, ὡς Στωϊκός, Ποσειδῶνος αὐτὸν εἶναί φησι.
771 Scholia in Hom. Iliad. Θ 441. ἀμβωμοῖσι· Χρύσιππος ὑφ’ ἓν προφέρεται, ὁ μέντοι Ἀρίσταρχος δύο μέρη λόγου etc. Etymol. Magn. s. v. ἀμβωμοῖσιν· ἀντὶ τοῦ περὶ τοῖς βωμοῖς. Χρύσιππος ὑφ’ ἓν προφέρει, ὁ μέντοι Ἀρίσταρχος δύο μέρη λόγου.
772 Scholia ad Hom. Iliad. Κ 252. Χρύσιππος δὲ ὥσπερ εἴ τις, φησί, περὶ τριῶν ἡμερῶν διαλεγόμενος ἐν τῇ τρίτῃ λέγει μίαν ἀπολείπεσθαι ἔτι ἡμέραν, κἂν μὴ περὶ ὄρθρον ποιῆται τοὺς λόγους, οὕτως καὶ τὸν Ὀδυσσέα εἰ καὶ πλέον ἦν παρῳχηκὸς τῶν δύο μοιρῶν τὴν τρίτην φάναι καταλείπεσθαι, ἐπειδὴ τριμεροῦς οὔσης τῆς νυκτὸς ἕκαστον μέρος ἕν τι λαμβάνεται, ὥστε κἂν ἐλλιπὲς ᾖ τοῦτο καὶ μὴ ὁλόκληρον, ἀλλ’ ἀριθμεῖσθαί γε τρίτην, τῷ τάξιν τῶν ἡμερῶν ἔχειν τὴν τρίτην. οὕτω γὰρ καὶ ἄνθρωπον παρὰ πόδα γενόμενον ἔτι τυγχάνειν τῆς ὅλης προσηγορίας.
773 Scholia in Hom. Iliad. Ν. v. 41. Χρύσιππος δὲ ὁ Στωϊκὸς καὶ Διονύσιος ὁ Θρᾷξ δασύνουσι τὸ „αὐΐαχοι“ ἵν’ ᾖ ξηρόφωνοι.
774 Scholia in Hom. Iliad. Ο. v. 241. ἀμφὶ ἓ γιγνώσκων· —— Χρύσιππος δὲ ψιλοῦν τὸ ε ὡς περισσεῦον, καί φησιν „ἀμφιγνοῶν ἀντὶ τοῦ ἀντιβάλλων.“
775 Scholia in Hom. Iliad. X 212. μέσσα· Χρύσιππος ῥῦμα γράφει· τὴν γὰρ ῥοπὴν τοῦ ζυγοῦ ῥύμην καλεῖσθαι.
776 Scholia in Hom. Odyss. Ε. 240. περίκηλα· Ἀρίσταρχος ὥσπερ ξηρὰ ἐκδεχόμενος, τὰ περικεκαυμένα ὑπὸ ἡλίου. Χρύσιππος δὲ διῄρει, περὶ κῆλα, περισσῶς ξηρά.
777 Etymol. Magn. s. v. ἐπικυνεῖν (p. 361, 13 Gaisf. ). καὶ Χρύσιππος γράψει Κυλλήνιος Ἑρμῆς, ἐπειδὴ ἡ ῥάβδος αὐτοῦ ἀνδρῶν ὄμματα θέλγει——Φαίακες δὲ θύουσιν αὐτῷ ἑσπέρας ὡς Ὅμηρος „ὅτε μνησαίατο κοίτου“ οὐχ ὅτι ὀνειρόπομπος ἦν ἀλλ’ ὅτι ὕπνου ἡδέος αἴτιος.